national health care?

Virgil Menefee: There are some positives to national health care - mostly for those who do not have health care insurance. It would not solve health care problems in the US. This is an example of redistribution of wealth.

Cecil Derenzi: There are some positives to national health careNo there isn't. Health care is not a right. If you have national health care it is not free, it comes from people working their butts off and paying enough taxes already. It would also be like Canada where youcan get care you just have to wait forever to get it. The last I heard it took about 6 months to get a cat scan in Canada. If you don't have health care now you can still go in an er and they will treat you ....Show more

Sharee Doak: The National Health Care Act of 1958 (国æ°'健康保険法 kokuminkenkouhokenhou?)' is a Japanese act that governs the National Health Insurance system operated by Japanese municipalities for residents who are not enrolled in Employees Health ! Insurance. It was passed by the Diet of Japan on December 27, 1958.[1 ..http://www.cenikor.org/

Ervin Laeger: We already have a kind of national health care system. It's called the ER. Anyone can show up and receive pretty good care. But people who don't have insurance are given ridiculous bills and can't ever pay them. The result? $400 ambulance rides and ERs across the nation closing because they bleed money.